Showing posts with label college economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college economics. Show all posts

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Unemployment, Labor Force, and Economic Recovery

Interesting piece of information in Bloomberg Businessweek today:

Size of the labor force. If more people are unemployed, that’s bad. But if the number of people in the overall labor force—including those with and without jobs—increases as well, it indicates people who had given up looking are being drawn back into the job search. The labor force grew by 642,000 people from April to May. It rose again in June, but by only 156,000.
What does this mean for unemployment numbers?  Well, the labor force participation rate partially measures optimism within the labor market.  During prolonged recessions and economic downturns, more individuals drop out of the labor force because they are able to find less jobs since employers are either keeping the amount of employees constant or laying them off while attempting to increase productivity.  We would see a negative growth rate in the labor force.  We can reasonably assume people are becoming discouraged--less optimistic--about finding employment.

During a sustained recovery, if people are optimistic about employment prospects, we should expect a positive growth rate in the labor force.  As in, people that were out of the labor force are coming back in, looking for work again.  I bet there are some more complicated variables here, but let's keep this conversation simple.

What does this mean for unemployment during economic recovery immediately and over the long-run after a recovery?

We would expect an uptick in unemployment immediately, as more people join the labor force, because they're more optimistic about finding a job.  This is a good sign.  Then we would expect a gradual decline in unemployment, assuming recovery is consistent.

So I don't think it's unusual that unemployment is stuck at 8.2% at the moment while there is job growth, albeit slow growth.  But this just means that the rate at which people are joining back in looking for work is greater than the rate at which the economy is producing jobs, at the moment.  That's a good sign, though.

A growing labor force is better than a decreasing labor force.  It's a sign of optimism.  Let's hope the recovery continues and fuels more optimism and jobs.

A good point to note, however, is:

The all-in jobs misery number. This category, known as U-6 among economists, includes the unemployed and the underemployed, such as those working part-time jobs even though they’d like full-time work, and those who have given up looking for work. The U-6 number has held steady at just under 15 percent for the past five months; it rose slightly, to 14.9 percent, in June. That’s not good; consumers need to feel confident in their full-time employment before they loosen the purse strings. The U-6 number is down from a year earlier, when it was 16.2 percent.
U-6 includes those underemployed and those who have stopped looking for work.  The U-6 number has held constant, potentially meaning the labor force hasn't actually grown because discouraged people became optimistic--but that younger laborers probably entered the market after graduating, therefore increasing the labor workforce (May and June are prime graduation months for college students).  

BUT: the constant rate could result from those who stopped looking for work just swooped into the underemployed category.  It's not necessarily good, but that does mean more jobs are available.  This still means individuals who stopped looking for work began looking for work again--and maybe found work (it's just not full-time, what they would have preferred).


Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Michigan: Supply and Demand of Primary Care Medical Residents and Specialists

2008-2012 National Resident Match Program Results for Michigan.


Medical Students (UME) Matched to their Residency Specialization (Graduate Medical School).

Michigan:

UME Students Matched to Primary Care Residencies for GME:
Years
Resident Type 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Grand Total
General Practitioner
Sum of Quota 94 94 99 111 109 507
Sum of Matched 83 83 86 98 99 449
Internal Medicine
Sum of Quota 153 157 182 168 190 850
Sum of Matched 153 157 181 168 190 849
Obstetrics-Gynecology
Sum of Quota 47 48 53 52 52 252
Sum of Matched 47 48 53 52 52 252
Pediatrics
Sum of Quota 91 95 110 109 103 508
Sum of Matched 90 94 107 104 103 498
Total Sum of Quota 385 394 444 440 454 2117
Total Sum of Matched 373 382 427 422 444 2048



UME Students Matched to Specialist Residencies for GME:
Years
Resident Type 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Grand Total
Non-Primary Care Providers
Sum of Quota 521 553 580 606 596 2856
Sum of Matched 480 522 536 557 542 2637
Total Sum of Quota 521 553 580 606 596 2856
Total Sum of Matched 480 522 536 557 542 2637


Do you see a shortage?


What may lie behind these results of physician shortages within Michigan?  Basic economic intuition could say the barriers to entry within the medical field limit the supply of doctors.  By barriers to entry, I mean the high cost of medical school and residency.


Or, we could explain excess demand from untaxed healthcare fringe benefits that drive up the total demand of healthcare--and therefore doctors--at a faster rate than our current medical education system can accredit and train the necessary doctors to reach that demand.


But we also run into a few snags.  Bigger academic and research hospitals usually don't face shortages.  There could also be regional differences: rural hospitals may find it harder to compete for physicians in the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP)--which I'll discuss a little later--and be left with no doctors left to fill their positions after they've been taken by bigger research hospitals or urban hospitals with more prestigious residency programs.


I don't know.  I'll have to look into this a little more.  


Interesting to think about, no?